Exynos Galaxy S10 visits GeekBench, nonetheless behind the iPhone XS in single-core take a look at
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has been noticed on GeekBench and the numbers are in. This time, it is the Exynos 9820 variant for South Korea (SM-G973N), and there are notable variations with the beforehand seen outcomes from the S10+ in Snapdragon 855 trim.
The only-core end result, specifically, is much forward of another chip within the Android world – the present Kirin 980 (across the 3400s) and Snapdragon 845 (ballpark is in 2400s) aren’t any match for the next-gen Exynos, and early Snapdragon 855 figures are a lot decrease too (3400-3550 relying on who you ask). In truth, the older Exynos 9810 will get closest, posting single core outcomes upwards of 3600 and into the excessive 3700s beneath the fitting situations. Even so, the iPhone XS stays out of attain.
GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)
Larger is best
-
Apple iPhone XS Max
4777 -
Samsung Galaxy S10 (E9820)
4382 -
Samsung Galaxy S9+
3771 -
Samsung Galaxy Note9
3642 -
Samsung Galaxy S10+ (S855)
3413 -
Huawei Mate 20 Professional
3291 -
Huawei Mate 20
3284 -
Xiaomi Mi Combine 3
2429 -
OnePlus 6T McLaren Version
2376
The multi-core efficiency is not as spectacular, although nonetheless respectable. On this situation, nevertheless, the Exynos Galaxy S10 is bested by the Kirin-packing Mate 20s and its personal Snapdragon sibling.
GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)
Larger is best
-
Apple iPhone XS Max
11432 -
Samsung Galaxy S10+ (S855)
10256 -
Huawei Mate 20
9793 -
Huawei Mate 20 Professional
9712 -
Samsung Galaxy S10 (E9820)
9570 -
Xiaomi Mi Combine 3
9065 -
Samsung Galaxy Note9
9026 -
OnePlus 6T McLaren Version
9005 -
Samsung Galaxy S9+
8883
With the Exynos 9810, Samsung targeted extra on offering greater single-core efficiency that competing designs within the Android realm and with the 9820 that push continues. Apple’s Bionic nonetheless units the developments in uncooked single-core energy, however Samsung is shortly catching up.