Razer Cellphone 2 vs Asus ROG Cellphone

Posted on

Razer Cellphone 2 vs Asus ROG Cellphone

Razer versus Asus. It’s the story of two pc producers which sooner or later stated, “let’s make a cellphone.” Whereas Asus made that call fairly a while in the past, it solely lately launched its first gaming cellphone – the ROG Cellphone. Though the Razer Cellphone 2 is Razer’s second such gadget, it’s however a sophomore dealing with Asus’ ROG Cellphone, as the corporate has years of cell and desktop expertise behind it.

Asus has completed nicely refining its handsets through the years, however Razer’s needed to adapt fast – overhauling a pair key misses from final yr. We’ve seen the brand new child on the block overtake the veterans earlier than; is that this Razer’s breakthrough second?

Design

The Razer Cellphone 2 and ROG Cellphone are clearly minimize from totally different design cloths in comparison with hottest telephones. Whereas the Razer sports activities a boxy, rectangular aesthetic with sizable bezels on the prime and backside for stereo audio system, cameras, and mics, the ROG manages to drag off a extra edge-to-edge design with its display screen, stereo audio system, and digicam configuration. The ROG’s reddish copper speaker grilles additionally assist to present it some flare whereas the rounded corners evoke a extra conventional design language.
The rounded glass again additionally makes the ROG really feel extra like telephones we’ve held earlier than, however the look is in contrast to something we’ve beforehand seen. The RGB-lit emblem and ornamental copper vents mix with the angular cutouts for the digicam, flash, and fingerprint sensor to create a cellphone that actually appears to be like prefer it’s a part of a gaming PC lineup.

The Razer Cellphone 2 – nonetheless extremely evocative of the Nextbit Robin from which its design was appropriated – opts for a extra discreet look with its fingerprint sensor tucked away contained in the side-mounted energy button, and its glass again, which appears to be like like a strong slab of obsidian, interrupted solely by the RGB-lit Chroma emblem and center-mounted dual-camera bump. The Razer’s backlit emblem may also gentle up primarily based on the colour of apps you’ve acquired notifications from – blue for Outlook, pink for Gmail, and so forth – one thing the ROG lacks.

Asus’ ROG cellphone, being the primary of its sort for the corporate, seems extra authentic in its appears to be like, in addition to its performance due to gamer-centric additions like a secondary, proprietary port comprised of two USB-C ports for attaching one of many many ROG Cellphone equipment or charging the ROG whereas gaming. That is additional highlighted by the inclusion of 1 such accent – an RGB-lit cooling fan – within the field with it.

All that apart, these two telephones have very related weights and dimensions, although the Razer seems larger on account of its boxy design. The Razer Cellphone 2 additionally meets the IP67 normal for mud and water resistance whereas the ROG Cellphone exceeds this with IP68.

As at all times, magnificence is within the eye of the beholder and there’s benefit to each design approaches, however to the unfamiliar observer, the ROG clearly screams gaming, whereas the Razer Cellphone simply screams “I’m one thing else!” Which of those is preferable, naturally, is as much as you.

Show

The shows on these two gaming telephones reveal additional divergence. Spec-wise we’ve got the ROG’s 2160 x 1080 px, AMOLED show with a max refresh charge of 90Hz versus the Razer Cellphone’s 2560 x 1440 px, IGZO LCD which reaches the ever-smooth 120Hz refresh charge.
That final half concerning the refresh charge might need some nervous, so we received’t mince phrases. The distinction between 90Hz on the ROG and 120Hz on the Razer is noticeable, and for some, this can be the explanation they favor the Razer Cellphone 2 over the ROG. We wouldn’t say it’s a full-out, game-winner for the Razer Cellphone, although.

Gaming at 90Hz is a smoother expertise on the ROG than most another non-gaming cellphone, on account of their decrease refresh charges. 120Hz on the Razer is smoother although, and for extended gaming, this distinction in consolation can have an considerable influence on eye fatigue, particularly throughout fast-paced video games.

The distinction in decision can also be obvious with the Razer Cellphone 2’s show trying only a bit sharper.

Whereas the ROG’s AMOLED show portrays punchy colours and deeper, inky blacks, the Razer Cellphone 2’s IGZO LCD proved to have extra correct colours. In reality, the Razer Cellphone’s show is without doubt one of the most correct we have seen on a cellphone. In relation to tweaking the show to your liking, although, the ROG simply takes the cake providing a number of presets in addition to guide controls for shade, saturation, and sharpness, versus the Razer’s easy triplet of presets. The variations between these three display screen modes (pure, boosted, and vivid) are virtually imperceptible on the Razer, which is sweet for shade accuracy, as each considered one of which is extremely correct, however dangerous for selection and customization.

Nonetheless, the ROG isn’t woefully inaccurate in its punchier shade presentation, so this will come right down to desire as nicely, however we discovered that the Razer Cellphone’s extremely correct colours, blended with the extra fluid 120Hz refresh charge finally made the Razer Cellphone 2 extra nice to take a look at and recreation on.

Interface and Performance

Each the Asus ROG Cellphone and Razer Cellphone 2 ship with Android 8.1 on-board and their respective producer software program taste added to the combo.

Nova Launcher and Cortex App

The Razer Cellphone’s implementation errs extra on the facet of inventory Android, using Nova Prime Launcher as the principle UI with a number of inexperienced icons and apps, in addition to the Razer-made Cortex app. That is the place you’ll discover your recreation library together with a tab for Sport Booster and one other providing 120Hz video games to obtain, amongst others.

Tweaking efficiency by Sport Booster is fairly easy; you may both customise the efficiency settings for every app manually or for all of them without delay by way of mode choice. This provides two modes – energy saving and efficiency – whereas the customized mode affords you the power to alter the decision, clock velocity, body charge, and anti-aliasing preferences on every particular person app. This may both be completed by way of a five-step slider with “extra battery” and “greater efficiency” at opposing ends, or by choosing these values individually.

There’s fairly some vary within the choices for every of those values – processor speeds can go as little as 1.36 GHz and as excessive as 2.Eight GHz, whereas minimal body charges attain 40 fps with 120 fps being the utmost – and the close to seven-hour distinction in projected battery life between the “energy save” and “efficiency” modes replicate that.

ROG UI and Sport Heart App

The ROG Cellphone’s UI, like its design comes off as extra customized and distinctive. Asus has years of ZenUI’s development and refinement driving lots of the extra customized experiences you’ll discover in ROG UI just like the deeper settings menu, ZenMotion gestures, and system cleanup app, as an illustration. Plus, the neon-sign-like iconography and darker aesthetic simply appears to be like cooler too. Nailing a UX that appears gamer-oriented with out being too cheesy or plain is one other instance of Asus’ a lot deeper background within the cellphone recreation.
The ROG’s Sport Heart app provides a number of, extra gaming-specific options in addition to a high-performance setting referred to as “X-Mode.” Very like the Razer Cellphone, Asus lets you customise body charge, processor velocity, and anti-aliasing preferences on an app-by-app foundation, however X-Mode can maintain the ROG acting at its highest for all processes. The processor velocity and body charge can’t go fairly as little as the Razer Cellphone 2 can (2.09 GHz and 60 fps on the ROG Cellphone, respectively) and determination can’t be modified per app, however we’d be keen to wager that the majority avid gamers will discover this stage of tweaking ample, particularly contemplating different options the ROG cellphone packs.

Sport Genie and Air Triggers

In contrast to the Razer Cellphone 2, the ROG Cellphone has a gaming dashboard dubbed Sport Genie which is accessible throughout gameplay and never solely provides a fast shortcut to efficiency tweaks, but additionally app integrations for quick and simple recreation streaming, macro creation, and Air Set off setup. Macros are mapped to gestures you should draw on the display screen, very similar to ZenMotion, however Air Triggers make the most of their very own {hardware} part – further, touch-sensitive buttons.

These touch-sensitive areas are on the precise facet of the cellphone, leaving your index fingers inside tapping distance when holding the ROG Cellphone in a panorama place. Sport Genie lets you map these two buttons to particular features in every recreation by dropping digital buttons over the on-screen ones; every distinctive configuration is saved for every recreation.

The implementation isn’t excellent – the touch-sensitive areas can be simpler to succeed in on the again of the cellphone, slightly than the facet – however an addition like this might be very welcome on the Razer Cellphone 2, and the straightforward button-mapping is one thing we deeply want we had with the Razer Cellphone’s equipment, which we’ll contact on in a bit.

The wide selection of efficiency management on the Razer Cellphone 2 is well-implemented and simple to make use of, however the ROG Cellphone has this, in addition to a extra mature, better-looking UI with extra gaming-oriented options. This ROG handily beats the Razer Cellphone 2 on this class.

Processor, Reminiscence, and Efficiency

The internals could also be as shut because it will get between these two telephones, however even right here there’s some notable variations.

Each run on pepped up variations of the newest Snapdragon 845 flagship processor, however the ROG is only a bit peppier on paper, maxing out at 2.96 GHz as oppose to the Razer’s 2.8. Eight gigs of RAM accompany the SD845 on each of those units, however the subsequent huge distinction is available in storage. We love the ROG’s beginning capability of 128 GB with the following step up being 512 GB, so the dearth of a Micro SD card slot is not that huge of a deal. The Razer Cellphone 2, however, comes solely in a 64 GB capability however permits for microSD card enlargement as much as 1 TB.

In day-to-day use, it’ll be subsequent to unattainable to note any of those variations; each telephones are exceptionally snappy and {smooth}. Skipping round from app to app and performing the requisite duties of a day by day driver present these two to be greater than succesful, as anticipated.

Gaming and Thermal Efficiency

So, who’s the king the place it actually counts? It’s really a reasonably shut name.

Neither the Razer Cellphone 2 nor ROG Cellphone will allow you to down in with their gaming efficiency. We at all times had fast load occasions and {smooth}, stutter-free gameplay.

That stated, the Razer Cellphone’s display screen at all times appeared smoother, with much less jitter in video games – even once we capped the refresh charge at 90Hz to match the ROG Cellphone. It appears Razer’s show components actually delivers ends in consolation and efficiency. The ROG is under no circumstances exhausting on the eyes for gaming – it’s extra comfy than most any cellphone with a 60 Hz refresh charge – however the Razer Cellphone 2 appears to be like and feels higher instantly while you begin gaming, and particularly as your session wears on.

In relation to battery life and thermal efficiency, they’re fairly evenly matched, however the ROG Cellphone appears a bit higher at maintaining its cool. Each make the most of Vapor Chamber cooling and neither bought scorching sufficient to trigger any discomfort or fear throughout our testing, even in some extended, intensive classes. Checking the temperatures, although, we discovered the Razer Cellphone 2 to persistently be wherever from 5 to 10 levels hotter after longer classes, regardless of having virtually equivalent battery discharge charges throughout the identical intervals. We wouldn’t say this can be a distinction you may really feel together with your fingers although, as they each can heat up however keep inside an affordable vary.

Equipment

Gaming on telephones has made leaps and bounds in turning into an expertise folks – many individuals, in reality – can deeply take pleasure in. Many issues wanted to occur to assist this alongside, however there are nonetheless a number of elements that would use some assist. Asus is nicely conscious of this and has tackled a great quantity of those shortcomings in cell gaming with numerous equipment for the ROG Cellphone.
Asus provides six totally different ROG Cellphone-specific peripherals that help the ROG in gaming longer, cooler, extra comfortably, and in additional versatile, but acquainted methods – considered one of which even comes within the field with the cellphone. That is compared to the Razer Cellphone 2 which solely has one accent for gaming, bought individually.

Out of the ROG’s six equipment, 4 are various kinds of docking stations with the next emphases.

Cellular Desktop Dock ($229.99) – a dock providing Four USB-A ports, Gigabit LAN, HDMI out, Show out, a microphone, 3.5mm headphone jack, Micro-USB, and an SD card slot. This basically makes the ROG Cellphone a mini desktop pc.

Skilled Dock ($119.99) – a dongle which provides HDMI, two USB-A ports, and Gigabit LAN to your ROG Cellphone. This brings the desktop expertise with a number of much less ports, and some much less {dollars} spent

Twinview Dock ($399.99) – a clamshell gadget consisting of a second, Android-powered display screen with two extra audio system, a further 6,000 mAh battery, and a spot to mount the ROG Cellphone. This offers the ROG a little bit of the Nintendo DS expertise, however developer help is severely missing for interactive content material, like controls or maps, on the second display screen. As an alternative, the second display screen features extra like one other Android cellphone.

WiGig Show Dock ($329.99) – an excellent low-latency wi-fi dock for mirroring the ROG’s display screen on a bigger one. Paired with the Gamevice controller, the ROG shows its Nintendo Change-like versatility.

The ROG’s Gamevice Controller ($89.99) and Aeroactive cooling fan (free with the cellphone) spherical out the six, bringing online game console controls and funky, environment friendly gaming, respectively. To recap, the ROG’s equipment can bolster battery life, cool the cellphone, connect with huge screens, convert the cellphone to an I/O-filled desktop pc, and add console-like controls.

What say you, Razer?

Simply the console controller bit? Very nicely. Whereas we love the ergonomics and lots of button functionalities on the $150 Raiju Cellular controller, it falls quick in a single key space – compatibility. For probably the most half, Asus’ Gamevice controller and the Raiju are appropriate with the identical video games, a pair hundred or so, however most huge titles are lacking from this checklist.

That is the place Asus’ Air Set off software program actually exhibits its price. The identical drag-and-drop key mapping for on-screen controls discovered within the ROG’s “Air Triggers” menu permits the Gamevice controller to map its controls on any recreation. Within the biz they name {that a} recreation changer.

We will safely say that the ROG wins this spherical decisively.

Connectivity

In fact, you’ll discover requisite options like dual-band Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.zero on each of those units, however the Razer Cellphone 2 edges out the ROG right here with wi-fi charging, and compatibility with all 4 main U.S. carriers. The ROG isn’t appropriate with Verizon or Dash, and charging currents don’t circulate by the again of this cellphone.

Digicam

Asus has impressed us with the cameras on quite a lot of of their current units – the ROG included. Right here we’ve got a dual-camera setup that pairs a 12 MP common lens with an Eight MP wide-angle. EIS is used on each, however no optical picture stabilization is integrated.

Razer’s overhauled the Razer Cellphone 2’s cameras just about fully from the unique Razer Cellphone in each {hardware} and software program. This yr we’ve got two center-mounted, 12 MP cameras. The primary digicam makes use of a wider-angled lens and the secondary shooter a telephoto one. Optical stabilization is current on the principle digicam.

So, what’s Razer’s extra simplistic, revamped digicam capable of do in comparison with the refined and feature-rich ROG?

Picture High quality

Each of those handsets are able to taking okay-looking, correct photographs with little effort. Most of the time, these are the outcomes we acquired, however there are areas through which each would generally falter. It was really a bit peculiar, because it appeared that lots of the Razer Cellphone’s misses had been hits for the ROG and vice versa, virtually as if they honestly had been fated to sooner or later meet for battle.

In brighter lighting conditions, the Razer’s digicam would typically wash colours out a noticeable bit greater than the ROG. Over-sharpening is also recognized in photographs the place the ROG had no such challenge. In dynamic low-light, although, the Razer Cellphone 2 sometimes grabbed extra particulars than the ROG, which could possibly be susceptible to smoothing and blur. These nitpicks apart, most footage you are taking with both of those telephones will come out ok. No “for a gaming cellphone” qualification needed.

These two telephones actually made us work to decide on a victor. Ultimately, we’re going to need to name this one a draw as, for probably the most half, they each shoot pleasing photographs however every now and then reveal their particular weaknesses.

Video

Video high quality on these two can also be fairly related. Each seize as much as 4K decision at 30 fps, however whereas the Razer’s OIS helps {smooth} issues out a bit, each might be susceptible to extra jittery motion than we’d wish to see. Very like in pictures, the Razer Cellphone can wash colours out a bit, too. The Razer additionally information quieter audio than the ROG, and Asus’ gadget picks up extra gentle in darker scenes. It’s one other shut one right here, however we’ll give the sting to Asus by a hair.

Name High quality

Calls on each telephones confirmed no obtrusive points. The earpieces on these are greater than ample and the speakerphones are fairly highly effective on each. The Razer Cellphone 2 does sound barely much less tinny than the ROG’s, although.

Media

As gaming telephones, the ROG and Razer Cellphone can be fairly disappointing with no robust media prowess. Fortunately, they each have loud, full-sounding twin audio system firing proper at your face which simply immerse you in video games, music, movies, or in any other case. The ROG does sound a tad tinnier than the Razer, although.
Each deal nicely with spatial sounds on these twin audio system and each provide in-depth controls to tweak EQ – the Razer’s courtesy of Dolby and Asus’ from its proprietary Audio Wizard app.

The ROG cellphone has a 3.5mm headphone jack in each the cellphone and the included Aeroactive Cooler accent, however the Razer Cellphone has no such port, bundling a USB-C to three.5mm adapter within the field.

Battery Life

Asus and Razer went with giant, 4,000 mAh batteries in these telephones however which makes probably the most of it?
In our use, gentle, heavy, and even idle, we discovered the Razer Cellphone to be extra environment friendly with its battery use however by a reasonably small margin. After placing the 2 telephones by their highest- and lowest-power use instances (and the whole lot in between) we often discovered the Razer Cellphone to be one or two battery share factors greater than the ROG, which may add up. We additionally noticed this slight benefit in our customized drain check, the place the Razer Cellphone 2 lasted about 30 minutes longer, however we wouldn’t say that both of those telephones are juice sippers.

Each units are QuickCharge 4.zero licensed, however the Razer Cellphone 2 juiced up from zero to 100 in about 2 hours – 30 minutes longer than the ROG took.

Conclusion

We should say, as cell followers, it’s a wonderful day when we’ve got two nice telephones to match towards each other, and a good higher day after they’re gaming telephones. Not so way back, the concept of a “gaming cellphone” conjured up nothing however excessive expectations and the inevitable failure to fulfill them. We will fortunately and truthfully say that neither of those telephones failed us in any manner.
It’s a detailed race between these two – we are able to’t deny that. Efficiency, battery life, and the cameras on these two telephones are neck and neck, so the large choice could come right down to just some gaming options.

For the ROG Cellphone, the largest promoting level for avid gamers is the a number of equipment which convey enjoyable and performance and may actually remodel the gaming expertise – particularly with a controller that may map to any recreation – an enormous benefit for the ROG.

Then again, the Razer Cellphone 2’s buttery 120 Hz refresh charge on an already stunning show makes us really feel proper at residence gaming for hours on the Razer Cellphone 2.

As at all times, desire is essential, and it doesn’t seem to be you may go unsuitable with both cellphone, so for now we’ll revel within the glory of simply having a selection between such succesful gaming telephones.

Execs

  • Distinctive show – vibrant, sharp, correct colours, and the beautiful 120 Hz refresh charge
  • Much less eye pressure and fatigue throughout lengthy intervals of gaming
  • Barely fuller sounding audio system
  • LED emblem on again doubles as notification gentle

Execs

  • Nice collection of equipment that broaden and enhance the gaming expertise
  • Gamevice Controller accent might be mapped to any recreation
  • Bigger on-board storage capacities
  • Extra distinctive, refined UI
  • Useful in-game dashboard for macros, Air Triggers, streaming, and extra

Gravatar Image
I like technology, hopefully I can provide useful information for viewers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *